
Thank the heavens – March Madness is back in our lives once again. Let’s break down the Midwest Region.
What This Is: A resource. There are endless ways to study this bracket – and I urge you to read up on team summaries, see recent performance, and study who it is that leads these teams.
Related:
March Madness: West Region Cheat Sheet
March Madness: South Region Cheat Sheet
March Madness: East Region Cheat Sheet
In general, I tend to gravitate to a few different factors. Teams with a senior-laden roster, teams that have won their conference tournament, teams that shoot the three exceptionally well, or if there is some other type of dynamic talent on the floor, be it a big man or NBA lottery pick.
The below is a compilation of each first round matchup for the Midwest Region and how teams stack up in the metrics that matter most to me. As always, a special shoutout to TeamRankings.com.
I’m taking a look at how these offenses and defenses rank nationally, and how reputable sites like KenPom and FiveThirtyEight grade out the squads.
This is heavily focused on analytics and statistics – I’ll be avoiding breaking down the lineups, I’m just trying to get a baseline view of these teams.
At the bottom, I’ll give you my picks for the region. I won’t pretend I’m an expert, I’m just looking at the numbers. Let’s begin.
Midwest Region: Rankings
#1 Illinois23-6 | #16 Drexel12-7 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 16 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 13 3P% Rank: 25 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 34 Defensive Efficiency: 53 Opp. 3P%: 117 OverallKenPom Ranking: 3 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 79% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 34 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 42 3P% Rank: 37 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 150 Defensive Efficiency: 170 Opp. 3P%: 82 OverallKenPom Ranking: 146 FiveThirtyEight% S16: <1% |
#8 Loyola-Chicago24-4 | #9 Georgia Tech17-8 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 9 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 26 3P% Rank: 81 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 37 Defensive Efficiency: 4 Opp. 3P%: 105 OverallKenPom Ranking: 9 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 12% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 42 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 41 3P% Rank: 112 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 262 Defensive Efficiency: 147 Opp. 3P%: 307 OverallKenPom Ranking: 32 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 9% |
#5 Tennessee18-8 | #12 Oregon St.17-12 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 168 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 93 3P% Rank: 165 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 25 Defensive Efficiency: 11 Opp. 3P%: 72 OverallKenPom Ranking: 21 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 44% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 231 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 101 3P% Rank: 123 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 190 Defensive Efficiency: 254 Opp. 3P%: 53 OverallKenPom Ranking: 85 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 10% |
#4 Oklahoma St.20-8 | #13 Liberty23-5 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 76 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 135 3P% Rank: 162 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 49 Defensive Efficiency: 78 Opp. 3P%: 76 OverallKenPom Ranking: 30 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 41% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 4 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 8 3P% Rank: 11 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 79 Defensive Efficiency: 68 Opp. 3P%: 86 OverallKenPom Ranking: 97 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 5% |
#6 San Diego St.23-4 | #11 Syracuse16-9 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 62 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 33 3P% Rank: 27 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 41 Defensive Efficiency: 9 Opp. 3P%: 126 OverallKenPom Ranking: 20 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 32% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 131 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 57 3P% Rank: 167 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 103 Defensive Efficiency: 139 Opp. 3P%: 66 OverallKenPom Ranking: 41 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 17% |
#3 West Virginia18-9 | #14 Morehead St.23-7 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 228 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 52 3P% Rank: 77 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 180 Defensive Efficiency: 154 Opp. 3P%: 91 OverallKenPom Ranking: 27 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 50% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 86 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 180 3P% Rank: 119 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 46 Defensive Efficiency: 38 Opp. 3P%: 33 OverallKenPom Ranking: 128 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 1% |
#7 Clemson16-7 | #10 Rutgers15-11 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 152 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 191 3P% Rank: 130 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 117 Defensive Efficiency: 43 Opp. 3P%: 164 OverallKenPom Ranking: 42 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 11% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 167 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 170 3P% Rank: 289 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 67 Defensive Efficiency: 102 Opp. 3P%: 84 OverallKenPom Ranking: 34 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 17% |
#2 Houston24-3 | #15 Cleveland St.19-7 | ||
OffenseeFG% Rank: 104 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 5 3P% Rank: 87 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 1 Defensive Efficiency: 3 Opp. 3P%: 7 OverallKenPom Ranking: 6 FiveThirtyEight% S16: 72% | OffenseeFG% Rank: 132 Offensive Efficiency Rank: 136 3P% Rank: 258 DefenseOpp. EFG% Rank: 120 Defensive Efficiency: 187 Opp. 3P%: 35 OverallKenPom Ranking: 151 FiveThirtyEight% S16: <1% |
Midwest Region: First Round Picks
#1 Illinois over #16 Drexel
#8 Loyola-Chicago over #9 Georgia Tech
#5 Tennessee over #12 Oregon St.
#4 Oklahoma St. over #13 Liberty
#6 San Diego State over #11 Syracuse
#3 West Virginia over #14 Morehead State
#10 Rutgers over #7 Clemson
#2 Houston over #15 Cleveland St.
Loyola-Chicago’s numbers are pretty shocking for an eight-seed. KenPom has the former Cinderella a top-ten team in the entire country. That Georgia Tech defense is abysmal, and while they’re fresh off an ACC championship, it’s hard to ignore how much better Loyola is.
The Liberty offense rankings, and Oklahoma State’s lack of top metrics in those categories – has thrown me for quite a loop. The school has name recognition even among casuals like myself because of Cade Cunningham – the expected top pick in the NBA Draft. You have to roll with that individual talent, even though Liberty’s offense is as impressive as it gets on paper. Will likely take them to cover in this one.
There’s not much to like between Clemson-Rutgers. KenPom favors the Scarlet Knights, and with Rutgers known for their shot-blocking, I’ll give em a chance in this one.
Beyond that, it’s a chalk first round in this gauntlet of a region.
Second Round
#1 Illinois over #8 Loyola-Chicago
#5 Tennessee over #4 Oklahoma St.
#6 San Diego St. over #3 West Virginia
#2 Houston over #10 Rutgers
Sweet Sixteen
#1 Illinois over #5 Tennessee
#6 San Diego St. over #2 Houston
Elite Eight
#1 Illinois over #6 San Diego St.
That Tennessee-Oklahoma State second round game had me going back and forth for awhile. I’ve decided to advance Tennessee simply for the fact that their first round matchup against Oregon State is significantly less difficult than Oklahoma State’s against Liberty. Add in the contrarian value pick when most will likely be taking Cunningham and the Cowboys, and it’s the play for me.
I really like San Diego State’s balance – strong on both ends. Houston is one of the nation’s top defenses, but the teams they’ve beaten don’t wow me, not that SDST is much better. This is likely more a pick against chalk. I can’t put three 1 vs. 2s in my Elite Eight.
We haven’t yet talked about Illinois, one of the favorites to win the tournament. Their biggest weakness from above is their three-point defense. SDST would actually give them the toughest matchup, so if they meet in the Elite Eight, the Aztecs would have a chance.
I’m moving the Illini into the Final Four here. They’ve played as good as anyone this season and that momentum has to be respected.
So, that’s my Midwest Region – I hope you don’t blindly follow me. What I do hope is that the above metrics consolidated help bring you some familiarity with the teams playing.
For the next few regions, make sure you’re following on Twitter, @griffybets. Missed you March.
Join our Discord to leave a question or comment regarding this article. We have sports fans talking betting all day — every day! JOIN THE DISCORD NOW AND QUALIFY FOR PRIZES & BETTING SWAG!